CheckPeptides
CheckPeptides

European transparency & quality ranking

We compare peptide vendors that serve Europe across 19 criteria for product quality, service and transparency. Every point links to its source-verifiable evidence.

score = 100 × Σ(weight × points) ÷ Σ(weight of verified criteria)

Only vendors operating in or shipping to the European Union are listed. Vendors that do not serve Europe are shown separately.

  1. 1
    Small but high-quality catalogue with professional operations: verifiable Janoshik CoA, accessible payments (PayPal + card) and DDP EU shipping. Still building up the number of published lots.
    Product quality95
    Accessibility & trust95
    Service quality88
    Transparency95
    Testing breadth50
    Evidence coverage: 96%Verified: 2026-07-28
    92
  2. 2
    Solid European operation from Romania: full legal entity, broad catalogue with Janoshik CoAs and good shipping coverage. SEPA/bank payments only, no card.
    Product quality95
    Accessibility & trust90
    Service quality88
    Transparency95
    Testing breadth67
    Evidence coverage: 100%Verified: 2026-07-28
    91
  3. 3
    Veteran with a very broad catalogue and shipping to 50+ countries, card and crypto. Less consistent per-lot data and low-visibility legal entity.
    Product quality95
    Accessibility & trust90
    Service quality81
    Transparency95
    Testing breadth83
    Evidence coverage: 100%Verified: 2026-07-28
    91
  4. 4
    Spanish vendor with a good image and Janoshik CoAs, but somewhat old certificates, Wise/transfer-only payment and an unclear legal entity.
    Product quality95
    Accessibility & trust80
    Service quality81
    Transparency95
    Testing breadth67
    Evidence coverage: 100%Verified: 2026-07-28
    87
  5. 5
    The most complete on analysis (purity, metals, endotoxin, bioburden) with 85+ CoAs; very professional site. Restrictive returns and no card payment.
    Product quality95
    Accessibility & trust70
    Service quality75
    Transparency95
    Testing breadth83
    Evidence coverage: 100%Verified: 2026-07-28
    85
  6. 6
    Large volume of CoAs and good logistics, but the lab (SafeCert) is not verifiable at source and purity is not readable in its certificates.
    Product quality50
    Accessibility & trust80
    Service quality75
    Transparency95
    Testing breadth83
    Evidence coverage: 96%Verified: 2026-07-28
    72
  7. 7
    Wide per-country presence but low operational trust: hidden ownership, no verifiable independent lab and reputation red flags.
    Product quality50
    Accessibility & trust40
    Service quality79
    Transparency67
    Testing breadth50
    Evidence coverage: 89%Verified: 2026-07-28
    58

Not available in Europe

Verified vendors that do not ship to the EU (reference only; not purchasable from Europe).

  1. 1
    Very good CoA transparency (Janoshik + several labs) and a registered entity, but ships to the US only: not an option for the European buyer.
    Product quality95
    Accessibility & trust50
    Service quality95
    Transparency95
    Testing breadth83
    Evidence coverage: 93%Verified: 2026-07-28
    88
  2. 2
    87 public Janoshik reports and a professional site with card/Apple Pay, but US-only shipping.
    Product quality95
    Accessibility & trust60
    Service quality75
    Transparency95
    Testing breadth95
    Evidence coverage: 100%Verified: 2026-07-28
    85
  3. 3
    30+ verifiable Janoshik CoAs and good transparency, but US-only and payments leaning on Zelle/Cash App.
    Product quality95
    Accessibility & trust50
    Service quality81
    Transparency95
    Testing breadth67
    Evidence coverage: 100%Verified: 2026-07-28
    82
  4. 4
    Successor to an FDA-shut brand: makes testing claims but publishes no real CoAs, P2P payments with no protection and no identifiable entity. Avoid.
    Product quality6
    Accessibility & trust40
    Service quality81
    Transparency33
    Testing breadth0
    Evidence coverage: 96%Verified: 2026-07-28
    37